Bias reduction in conditional logistic regression.

نویسندگان

  • Jenny X Sun
  • Samiran Sinha
  • Suojin Wang
  • Tapabrata Maiti
چکیده

We employ a general bias preventive approach developed by Firth (Biometrika 1993; 80:27-38) to reduce the bias of an estimator of the log-odds ratio parameter in a matched case-control study by solving a modified score equation. We also propose a method to calculate the standard error of the resultant estimator. A closed-form expression for the estimator of the log-odds ratio parameter is derived in the case of a dichotomous exposure variable. Finite sample properties of the estimator are investigated via a simulation study. Finally, we apply the method to analyze a matched case-control data from a low birthweight study.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Inference using conditional logistic regression with missing covariates.

When there are many nuisance parameters in a logistic regression model, a popular method for eliminating these nuisance parameters is conditional logistic regression. Unfortunately, another common problem in a logistic regression analysis is missing covariate data. With many nuisance parameters to eliminate and missing covariates, many investigators exclude any subject with missing covariates a...

متن کامل

Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis.

Conditional logistic regression was developed to avoid "sparse-data" biases that can arise in ordinary logistic regression analysis. Nonetheless, it is a large-sample method that can exhibit considerable bias when certain types of matched sets are infrequent or when the model contains too many parameters. Sparse-data bias can cause misleading inferences about confounding, effect modification, d...

متن کامل

Comparison of the missing-indicator method and conditional logistic regression in 1:m matched case-control studies with missing exposure values.

The missing-indicator method and conditional logistic regression have been recommended as alternative approaches for data analysis in matched case-control studies with missing exposure values. The authors evaluated the performance of the two methods using Monte Carlo simulation. Data were generated from a 1:m matched design based on McNemar's 2 x 2 tables with four scenarios for missing values:...

متن کامل

How to reduce bias in the estimates of count data regression?

Maximum likelihood estimation is a method commonly used for parameter estimation. The main disadvantage of this method is that it can be heavily biased for small samples. Firth (Biometrika,1993) suggested method for reduction in bias through a penalization of the likelihood. This bias reduction method is used frequently. LogXact®, SAS® and STATA® provided this method for binary regression. In c...

متن کامل

The Second-order Bias and MSE of Quantile Estimators

The finite sample theory using higher order asymptotics provides better approximations of the bias and mean squared error (MSE) for a class of estimators. However, no finite sample theory result is available for the quantile regression and the literature on the quantile regression has been entirely on the first-order asymptotic theory. This paper develops new analytical results on the second-or...

متن کامل

Detection of and Adjustment for Multiple Unmeasured Confounding Variables in Logistic Regression by Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling

Aim: To compare the bias magnitude between logistic regression and Bayesian structural equation modeling (SEM) in a small sample with strong unmeasured confounding from two correlated latent variables. Study Design: Statistical analysis of artificial data. Methodology: Artificial binary data with above characteristics were generated and analyzed by logistic regression and Bayesian SEM over a pl...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Statistics in medicine

دوره 30 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011